Medical Approach Part I
To view this article in PDF Format,
Click
here
A Medical
Approach to Sports Performance Enhancement
Part I: The
Evaluation
Mitch Hauschildt, MA, ATC,
CSCS
Maximum
Training Solutions, LLC
Springfield, Missouri
In recent years, much has been made of
special programs to reduce injury
rates for soccer athletes, with good reason. Injuries
such as ACL tears, ankle sprains, hamstring strains, and low back pain
occur at an alarming rate for athletes of all ages and levels.
Typically, injury
prevention programs are designed to be short “add-ons” to warm-up,
lifting, conditioning, or practice sessions, with little concern for
improved performance. Or, they are short
4-6 week programs, leaving coaches struggling to find the best times
during the year to perform such training and worrying about the health
of their team between their training cycles. Overall,
most of these injury prevention programs have achieved some level of
success, educated a number of people on the importance of injury
prevention, and saved thousands of athletes from pain and suffering.
We know that sports medicine
professionals are concerned with injuries, but strength and
conditioning coaches are looking for performance. Oftentimes,
performance coaches have little desire to worry about injuries
and feel that the suggestions provided to them for injury
prevention are remedial and tedious for their purposes. Conversely, sports medicine personnel
traditionally see the performance personnel as “meat heads” looking for
more speed or weight at all costs. Thus,
there is a tendency to dedicate blocks of time to warmup, prevention,
power,
strength,
flexibility,
etc.
Separating blocks of time and priority
levels only serves to confuse athletes and waste valuable training time. Everyone is trying to get more training into
their limited amounts of time while also attempting to promote recovery. This is true of the professional, collegiate
and youth levels. By bridging the gap
between sports medicine and sports performance enhancement, we can prevent
injury and improve performance while maximizing the efficiency of
training.
What is a medical approach to sports performance
enhancement?
Simply put, it’s a technique for
integrating traditional physical medicine techniques into strength and
conditioning models to prevent
injuries and increase performance. This
includes:
n
Examining rehabilitation
philosophies for clues as to how to prevent
injuries
n
Neuromuscular
education and re-education by cluing in on motor learning and neuro
feedback loops
n
Adapting known exercises
to improve biomechanics
n
Integrating simple,
quick exercises into workouts for a more well-rounded workout
n
Choosing and following
appropriate exercise progressions
Integrating sports medicine concepts
into strength and conditioning is not a new concept for many people. But, unfortunately this concept has struggled to
take hold with the masses, due to a lack of knowledge and communication
between sports medicine and strength and conditioning staffs.

Figure 1: The Athletic
Continuum
Historically, sports medicine has been
very good at very basic, controlled movements with either injured
athletes or those
facing extreme difficulty with athleticism. Conversely,
many strength coaches prefer to work with those athletes who can only
do rather advanced, complex movements and workout schemes.
Consequently, many underdeveloped athletes and/or
athletes who have minor injuries fall somewhere between the two areas
and never realize their full potential. As
illustrated in Figure 1, every athlete falls somewhere on the athletic
continuum. By closing the knowledge gap
between the two areas of expertise, we can find talent otherwise unseen
and turn them into great players.
Evaluation
The athletic continuum illustrated
above is a great tool for understanding the knowledge base and
potential gap, but it only works if you understand where your
athlete(s) falls on the continuum. Thus,
your ability to assess your athletes is the key to program design. After all, if you don’t know your athlete(s),
how can you prescribe workouts for them?
The
evaluation process used at Missouri State
University
includes:
It isn’t overly important exactly what
tools you use to evaluation your athletes, as long as it is fairly
comprehensive in nature and it gives you a good understanding of your
athlete’s strengths, weaknesses, and potential. Make
it work for you and your athletes.
Some
areas of emphasis for our evaluation are:
Foot Biomechanical
Analysis
 |
During weightbearing and gait, you
want to evaluate your athlete’s pronation or supination.
An athlete who pronates will have feet which
flatten excessively (Figure 2). Another
area to evaluate is their hip rotation while walking.
An athlete who internally rotates at the hip
will appear to have knees which face each other while walking. This is important because the most common mechanism of
injury
for an ACL tear is foot pronation, hip internal rotation, and valgus at
the knee (knock kneed position) (Figure 3). This is not to say
that you need to stay awake at night worrying about an athlete that has
any one of these biomechanical disadvantages. However, if an
athlete presents to you with foot pronation and hip internal rotation
(Figure 4), you may want to consider having them fitted for orthotic
inserts in their shoes to block the pronation and eventual hip rotation
and valgus. |
| Figure
2: Foot Pronation |
|
 |
| Figure 3: Pronation, Hip Rotation, & Valgus during
Landing |
Figure 4:
Pronation & Hip Rotation while Standing |
This can be a very detailed process
that may be best left to medial personnel for the decision on who and
when an athlete should be fitted for such a device.
However, a basic understanding of some risk factors
will help you decide who gets referred for a further workup.
Lumbopelvic Evaluation
Another
biomechanical evaluation is analyzing and recognizing possible
deficiencies due to a leg
length discrepancy and/or an unnatural positioning of the pelvis. Once again, a full understanding of the
biomechanics of the pelvis is likely best left to medical personnel,
but possessing the ability to perform a simple leg
length evaluation will pay valuable dividends when trying to
decrease the rate of lower extremity injury.
The evaluation begins with an athlete
lying on their back on a table (Figure 5). Grasp
both ankles and passively bend their knees, taking their knees to their
chest (Figure 6). At that point, you will
bring their feet flat with their knees bent at a rate greater than 45
degrees. Have the athlete raise their
hips, bridging them as high off the table as possible (Figure 7). Have them relax and straighten their legs
passively. With their legs completely
relaxed, distract their legs and compare the leg length by looking at
ankle bones on the inside of their legs (Figure 8).
|
|
| Figure 5: Starting Position |
Figure 6: Knees to
Chest |
|
|
| Figure 7: Hip Bridge |
Figure 8: Distract
& Assess Length |
If at this point, the bones on the
insides of the ankles don’t line up (Figure 9), it is advisable to
refer that athlete to your medical staff to assess the athlete further. This leg
length discrepancy may be due to an anatomical
leg length issue (one leg is actually longer than the other) or the
athlete may have a condition with the alignment of their hips, causing
a functional
leg length discrepancy. Either way, an
athlete with some sort of leg length problem is at a greater risk of
injury, and/or will have the potential to have a decrease in
performance due to an asymmetry in the body’s neurological
feedback loop.
|
Realistically speaking, it should not
be expected that a coach will understand and possess the ability to
correct all of these issues. However, it
is important that you recognize those who are at risk for these issues
and know when to refer to proper medical personnel.
|
| Figure 9: Leg Length Descrepency |
Basic Movement Skills
It is highly recommended that an
athlete’s movement patterns be assessed in several ways to look at
their ability to use their biomechanics in advantageous patterns for
athletic movement. An excellent tool for
assessing movement patterns in a controlled environment is the Functional Movement Screen™. This tool quickly and efficiently evaluates
each athlete in seven distinct areas. It
does a great job of helping each coach asses core stability, mobility,
flexibility, and balance in a controlled environment.
For detailed information on the Functional Movement Screen™,
visit
www.functionalmovement.com.
Another great tool for assessing
movement is the Hop, Stop and
Leap test. Made popular in recent
years by Jeremy Boone,
the Hop, Stop and Leap
test assesses an athlete’s ability to produce power and decelerate
under control. Research shows that both
power and deceleration have a large impact on both performance in
soccer and ACL injuries. We utilize this
test to aid in evaluating an athlete’s ability to move functionally in
a more uncontrolled environment which tends to be more sport specific. For more information on this test, visit www.athletebydesign.com.
Keep in mind that it is not pertinent
that you perform these specific tests. However,
it is very important that you perform some sort of evaluation process
to address biomechanics, controlled functional movement, power
development, and deceleration in addition to the traditional
in-the-field tests that virtually every coach has performed for years. The evaluation process is very crucial and its
importance cannot be minimized. Remember,
the more that you know about your athletes and their abilities, the
better equipped you are to prescribe workouts.
Part
II of the “Medical
Approach to Sports Performance Enhancement” will discuss
programming to correct deficiencies based on the evaluation and proper
exercise programming to improve functional performance and decrease
injury.
Back to
Sports Medicine Articles
Back to Home