Medical Approach Part II
To view this article in PDF Format,
Click here
A Medical
Approach to Sports Performance Enhancement
Part II: The
Program
Mitch Hauschildt, MA, ATC,
CSCS
Maximum
Training Solutions, LLC
Springfield, Missouri
Part
I of the 2 part series on a “Medical
Approach to Sports Performance Enhancement” focused on the
thorough evaluation process of an athlete. With
the valuable information gained during an evaluation, you are equipped
with the tools needed to write a quality program for your athlete
and/or team.
Weak Link
Training
A comprehensive evaluation tool is
only as good as your willingness and ability to do something within
your training program to correct your team’s deficiencies.
All too often, the signs of serious flaws in a
team’s training program and/or athletic abilities are apparent when the
evaluation process is complete, but coaches are either unable, or
unwilling to change their training to meet the needs of their athletes. Like it or not, today’s athletes are very
different than those who played 10-20 years ago.
This is true of both their physical and mental approach to the game. So, as their trainer or coach, we must be
willing and able to adapt to the ever changing needs of our athletes.
Every athlete and team has a weak link. These should be identified during the
evaluation process and corrected immediately. The
first and easiest approach to corrective exercise is to analyze the
needs of your team overall. For example,
we perform a Functional
Movement Screen™ (for more information, visit www.functionalmovement.com)
with all of our athletes. If our team
tends to score poorly on the Deep Squat and Rotary Stability movements,
we obviously need to focus more attention as a team on those areas. Let the evaluation tool that you use, drive
your programming. Compare data with other
coaches or search the web for normative data on each test that you
perform to identify areas of weakness.
That’s not to say that you should only
focus on those areas, or dedicate the majority of your time to them. Rather, modify your workouts to include 2-3
extra exercises to improve the areas of concern.
In addition to the team approach, if
you have the facilities and manpower, take an individual approach to
weak link training. If done correctly, a
good performance enhancement program should be designed to improve the
abilities of approximately the middle 2/3 of the bell curve. Thus, it should be the best program for
approximately 67% of your athletes. The
mark of a truly good coach is understanding how to develop those
athletes to fit either 1 Standard Deviation above or below the mean.

Spending an extra 5 minutes per
workout to include 2-3 extra exercises that each athlete can do to
improve their personal abilities can do wonders to improve the team’s
overall athleticism. This is usually best
performed early in the workout. We prefer
to perform our team dynamic warmup followed by weak link training and
then we move into the bulk of our workout for the day; whether it is
movement skills, power development, strength, etc.
Thus, for the weak link period, we will typically
have one athlete performing an In Line Lunge stretch next to their
teammate who is performing an assisted deep squat with a band and so on. It is short and low intensity, but will make a
huge impact on your team by helping you take a more individualized
approach within a team setting.
The other option that works well for
many athletes and teams is to perform separate weak point training for
approximately 20 minutes 2-3 times per week at a different time during
the week. We take this approach with our
Men’s Basketball team during their offseason training.
The advantage of performing weak point in this
manner is that it allows for team training sessions to take a more
simplistic team training approach, while allowing for individualization
to occur at a separate workout. The
obvious disadvantage is more time spent in workouts.
Program
Design
Every performance enhancement program
should contain several key components. By
combining research with clinical experience, we have established the
following areas of emphasis which can be placed into 4 levels:
Biomechanics: Every athlete possesses a natural build which
is either advantageous or undesirable for the purposes of their sport. As an example, an athlete who is very
knock-kneed and flat-footed will be more likely to sustain an ACL tear
than an athlete who possesses a more neutral position.
An athlete’s biomechanics is a huge factor for
predicting injury. Thus, this factor MUST
be addressed prior to competing and reassessed periodically. While you will rarely be able to completely
fix a biomechanical issue, many times items such as orthotic inserts in
an athlete’s shoes or joint mobilizations will significantly help an
athlete’s poor situation
Mobility:
Mobility is defined as an athlete’s ability to
move their joint(s) through a range of motion while moving. Giles recently demonstrated that lack of
flexibility and mobility is the number one detriment for athletic
performance. This factor should be
addressed daily both pre and post workout with dynamic warmups and
static flexibility workouts.
Movement Skills: An athlete’s movement skills will have a
major impact on performance and injuries. This
includes running
mechanics, change of direction skills, jumping ability, landing
technique, and everything else movement related.
Quality of motion has to be the priority during this
part of the workout.
Deceleration: This pertains to an athlete’s ability to
slow under control from either a run or jump. It
is common knowledge that many non-contact knee and ankle injuries take
place while decelerating, but the performance component of deceleration
cannot be dismissed. Most of the great
athletes in the world are not necessarily faster, stronger, or more
skilled than their opponents. Most of them
combine those skills with an ability to stop under control faster than
their counterparts.
Core Stability:
Virtually all athletic movement begins at the core.
This is specifically the abdominal and low back
muscles. Don’t confuse core strength with
core stability. Just because an athlete
can perform hundreds of floor crunches does not mean they can
adequately stabilize the pelvis and low back.
Asymmetries: This refers to differences between an
athlete’s right and left side or front and back.
Athletes presenting with either strength or flexibility asymmetries
will eventually develop chronic injuries. These
athletes will also tend to have difficulty moving in multiple
directions with the same speed or efficiency.
Glute Strength: The glutes are arguably the most powerful
muscles in the lower extremity, but usually the most underused. It can be very difficult for athletes to
activate their glutes, thus robbing them of performance.
The glutes are best trained through bridging
movements and deep squats (below parallel).
Neuromuscular Control: The neurological system controls virtually
all movements in the athletic body. Many
athletes have the strength to control their body parts, but don’t
understand what positions are proper for performance (i.e. many
athletes don’t realize they enter a valgus or knock-kneed position
during squatting movements). Teaching an
athlete what positions their body is in and how to fire appropriate
muscles is the key to controlling the extremities.
Proprioception: This is defined as a joint’s awareness of
where it is in space. This is easily
trained by performing single leg balancing activities.
Hip Abductor Strength: These are the muscles on the outer hip
responsible for moving the leg outward, away from the body’s midline. These muscles control the knee to keep it
from entering the inward valgus position which leads to so many ACL
tears.
Eccentric Strength: An eccentric contraction of a muscle occurs
when a muscle contracts as the muscle gets longer.
This usually occurs as a muscle attempts to
decelerate a limb (i.e. Hamstring fires to decelerate the lower leg
during sprinting). Eccentric contractions
are very difficult for the muscle to perform and many times a great
deal of damage can occur during this point of the
contraction/relaxation cycle.
The following table illustrates each
factor and how often it should be addressed:
